Applying politics to pedagogy and grading doesn’t work


Why are school board elections nonpartisan? Why don’t we apply political goals to schools as often as we can? Because… they don’t apply.

There is a popular example of why socialism doesn’t work in society where a professor will average out test scores and then hand that same score out to everybody. By the end, everybody gives up on trying because the high scorers are punished unjustly and the low scorers are rewarded overcompensatorily. This story is available across the Internet so I won’t bother posting it in full here.

Here’s an issue with this: civilization isn’t just test grades and wealth redistribution. School is a safe sandbox (not a garden) to learn and nurture oneself in. Therefore we give more chances in school, unlike our society of no chances. School is a place to perfect perfection, not to demonstrate perfection like society is.

If you still think this is defensive liberal propaganda, why don’t we try a free-market, laissez-faire school system?

Here are the rules that apply for the socialist and laissez-faire demonstration:

  • The teacher controls what happens to the grades (score distribution)
  • There will be tests with fair grading at the beginning
  • No cheating takes place during testing
  • The teacher sets the rules
  • If the students fail to perform well, the dean will fire the teacher. (In the case of the socialist example, pretend the teacher gave massive curves to everybody at the end, because that’s what happened with FDR’s New Deal: an interventionalist Keynesian policy.

Several students emerge at the top of the exams scores and the rest of the students don’t do so well. The elite students start to hoard all of the prime study materials to themselves and threatens to fail themselves in the professor’s class (getting him fired) unless he ditches the retest policy, doesn’t give curves, and lets the well-testers provide exclusive tutoring to the other students. Sure enough, the elite students don’t tutor anything and instead continue to hog study materials, get great test scores, and aren’t invalidated by the curves given by the professor. Also, most of the students will fail the class and cannot even retake the test, meaning they bomb the entire course. And by the way, all of those who fail automatically get their score dropped to a zero. At this point, the Dean honors the well-doing students because of their façade presented and doesn’t care anymore about the failing students.

This model sure is a counter for the stupid “socialism” experiment in school.

But why do neither of these models work?

  1. School policy is modified too drastically.
  2. Students have too much bargaining power. Nobody has this kind of power in real life unless they are the elite.
  3. Grades are way too subjective and don’t reflect money accurately due to its restrictions and issuance.
  4. It’s imperfect, yet a school system offers more opportunities to succeed as fairly as possible.

Now please stop applying politics to school.

@ShareNet, a Wi-Fi Co-Op


Wouldn’t it be great if one could travel somewhere and automatically be connected to a Wi-Fi network? It:

  • saves mobile data
  • better access to the internet
  • more efficient use of Wi-Fi network

Imagine Bob is jogging through his neighborhood. When Bob leaves his house, he loses access to his Wi-Fi network, BobNet. He jogs past Sherri’s house. Sherri’s Wi-Fi network is SherriNet. Neither match, so neither can use each other’s Wi-Fi network without sharing. But sometimes, they go over to each others’ houses. Also, Bob streams Spotify through his headphones when jogging past Sherri’s house, using a lot of data. The issue is, whenever Wi-Fi is needed the most, or outside one’s home, it never seems to be there.

But if Bob and Sherri and all of their neighbors added a guest network (with a password) called @ShareNet to their own home, they’ll also get access to every other @ShareNet Wi-Fi access point! So, whenever Bob is jogging, he will automatically be connected to the guest Wi-Fi network in each house that he jogs past. Now, when Sherri is at home, she uses SherriNet, but whenever she visits Bob, she doesn’t need the password to BobNet. She just uses @ShareNet.

All of the neighbors have ONE password for @ShareNet, so it’s important to keep this key integrous (the key must be of integrity). If Gordon the villain neighbor decides to leak the password of @ShareNet on 4chan, everybody’s screwed and Gordon will be attacked by an angry mob at the next HOA meeting. Most neighbors can set up a WPA2 Personal Wi-Fi guest network on their routers easily, but not a RADIUS server. The only way to keep @ShareNet integrous is to continually update the password (pre-shared key/PSK) and to maintain control over who is participating in @ShareNet. Also, it’s not okay to simply stop offering @ShareNet at your house while continuing to use @ShareNet in others’ houses.

So if you want to join @ShareNet in real life, we’ll try to keep it secure and centralized as much as possible. Just shoot me an email ( Thanks!

Improving McKinney ISD’s focus on academics?

Here’s some thoughts on what McKinney ISD can do:
  • Add more coaches for UIL Academics competitions, so that students can learn more, do well on the tests, and get scholarships. Plus, who doesn’t like a little school pride? (I think Lovejoy has mandatory club classes?)
  • Pay for our AP exams – We pay $30 for each AP exam right now and this might drive people away. Awesome teachers, great curriculum, but the payment might deter some non-lower-income parents from enrolling their kids in the classes.
  • Pay for dual credit – perhaps offer dual credit for free for all students that are eligible? It still costs money compared to regular classes.
  • Add a local-credit only class for SAT, ACT prep – we have some very well-performing students attending great schools, but what about everybody else? Offering a local-credit only class for SAT and ACT prep would boost everybody’s scores for colleges and add more National Merit Scholars.

Concerning my admission to the Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science


On Wednesday, March 23, (2016), I visited the University of North Texas’s early university program, called the Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science, for an invited interview, consisting of a math test and a group interview with questions being impromptu college essays, to determine placement within the program. While I accepted the invitation to go and interview, I am not sure if I will be admitted by the time May 7 rolls around. (May 7 is when admission notices go out.) In addition, if I were accepted, I do not know if TAMS is the best choice for continuing my education. On one end, it is a great college program, but on the other hand, the various limitations of the early “college” program suggest to me that a hidden torture chamber lies within.

Tentatively, it would be best for me to presume and act as if I were to continue my education at McKinney Boyd High School. The Home of the Broncos has been a moderately enjoyable experience, and it is with concern of my academic record that I decide to remain. Perhaps it is better to be predictably sliced by La Guillotine than to be “freely” suffocated without relief, so that I may have some control over the desperation like Rodion did to Pulcheria. From here, I will see where the wind blows. Wish me luck in my future!

(P.S. You can tell that my juxtaposition of English references to a reflective blog post concerning a math and science academy is ironic.)

UT Austin is cool


I visited the campus. I’m trying to adhere to my previous post’s introspectivity abstention, so yeah, here goes:

It’s a nice campus. Big and full of cool things to do. A little bit crowded but nothing like China. I’ll see if and how I can attend. #HookEm

Spring Break? More like [Internal] Spring Broken.


So, it’s Spring Break—so “relaxing” yet so stressful. So much homework to be done. So many concepts to catch up on. So, yeah, I have a project due in two days that I have yet to film its video (most important part of it!!). So, I don’t have time to write introspective blog posts. So working nonstop on the Boyd Website Redesign. So tired. So not rested. So broken.

The new McKinney ISD stadium misprioritizes the district’s needs


Our school district, the McKinney Independent School District, has recently decided to spend $62 million dollars on an athletic stadium. Supposedly necessary to replace our current Ron Poe Stadium, it will be one of the major landmarks of the school district and the city.

The only problem is, it’s a waste of money. Why?

Academics before athletics. That’s the chant of millions of parents in America placing an emphasis on their children’s education before they play. After all, there are certainly more people attending university to learn rather than to play a sport. That’s also why the number of academic scholarships surpass the number of athletic scholarships. It clearly establishes academics to be the priority. McKinney ISD does not see this. They think that the priority is playing. $62 million is a lot of money to play around with. Considering all of its students are required to be in classrooms learning but only a small percentage play varsity sports (the only team that gets players to universities), and we already have a decently-sized stadium, why exactly should there be an already overextended emphasis on sports? There shouldn’t be.

Our district is pitiful in educational rankings. Schools similar in size to McKinney’s three high schools have dozens more National Merit Scholars than any of our schools combined. In fact, last year, one of the most important scholarships in the United States was awarded to only TWO students in the entire McKinney ISD, both from Boyd.

This is a failure on the side of the district: it does not allocate enough of its priorities on actual learning, but rather on its sports. It’s great that our high schools are making state. But how does that help any of our students succeed in the real world? Perhaps one or two will go on to a university team and then a professional sports team. What about the rest of the students? Are they supposed to suffer because of subprime learning and make a fool of themselves in society?

How could $62 million be spent on education? For one, we could lower class sizes, add more teachers, who could emphasize skills more relevant to the real world. Each teacher’s salary is $49,100 a year. $62,000,000 / $49,100 = 1,262 teachers. We could add ONE THOUSAND teachers with this amount of money. Instead, we’d rather spend it on one or two athletes? They already have Ron Poe! It’s not like the stadium is the actual factor preventing athletes from succeeding. In school, however, the lack of funding prevents our teachers from accessing the resources they need, diminishing the amount of classes necessary to fully prepare our students for success, and prevents both the school district and students from following the path to success.

Let’s place more emphasis on education for all, not sports for a few.

McKinney Boyd HS website redesign – part 3


Screen Shot 2016-02-22 at 11.39.34 PM

We are now about halfway complete with the website redesign. Many pages have now been completed, and focus is turning on aesthetics, such as the home page, section “dividers” (if we use yearbook terminology), and improving the heart of it all, the navbar.

We have many excellent contributors, ranging from Bora to Jarod to Justin to Alex, who have contributed the majority of ideas. Andrew has continued to draft us up with great designs and mockups, including envisioning our directory search. He, Marvin, and Scott have been working on compiling all of our staff’s photos in a systematic way so that they are easily accessible using JavaScript.

A consultation with Dr. Ayers today revealed some significant work to be done on the main page, including adding carousel functionality and adding images more appealing to newcomers to Boyd rather than the recurring parents, who are more interested in the resources and news of Boyd rather than “About.”

Recently, I shared the website with the local community, who were very pleased with the newly redesigned website. This is encouraging to the entire redesign team, as our primary audience of this new design is indeed our parents and students.

McKinney ISD’s One to the World program should be more flexible to students


TL;DR: Either let students bring their own laptops, if they wish, or continue using a school MacBook. This should be done instead of forcing everybody to rent a district-owned MacBook with restrictions.

For decades, teachers have been taught various methods to ensure that all students are able to understand their concept by incorporating different learning styles into their curriculum, in order to cater to every single student, and ensure each and every one understands the concepts being taught. That means teachers give trust and a certain degree of choice to students. This system has worked.

At the onset of the 21st century, technology is the new thing and educators around the world are looking at ways to incorporate technology into their learning. The advantages are numerous; if properly utilized, technology can quickly solidify and even deepen students’ understanding than ever before. Of course, the disadvantages are also numerous; students are easily able to abuse technology so that they are able to avoid the monotony of school work and instead focus on games.

In 2014, McKinney ISD used millions in taxpayer dollars to require each and every single one of their freshmen to lease a laptop from the district so that the school district is able to incorporate technology into their curriculum. Granted, as a student in the initial group of laptop users, the lessons have been more engaging and allow us to spend less effort on the behind-the-scenes aspects of classwork and homework while increasing focus on actual engagement and acquisition of knowledge. My English teacher emphasizes how lucky we are to have access to an online journal database, JSTOR, with millions of journals scanned in and ready to be searched in a fraction of a second, while she would have to spend days to find the right articles in the library, spending thousands of hours and coins at the copier machine. There is no doubting the efficiency that technology brings us.

However, just like how learning styles are unique to each student, technology utilization styles are also very unique to each student, particularly for the more tech-savvy students being given these MacBook Airs. Unfortunately, these MacBook Airs have had filtering software and computer management restrictions added to them, preventing students from accessing games and using software not explicitly approved by McKinney ISD. Just as a kinesthetic learner has been forced to sit down, not move, and audibly listen to a lecture for an hour, some students interesting in using their own, unique technology are not allowed to do so on these MacBooks. These students are not joking when they are looking to install other software that would normally take months in the bureaucratic cycle to get approved for installation on their machines. They are simply different, and shouldn’t be unfairly penalized. Unfortunately, students were unfairly penalized. While this is a hot-button issue, it won’t be discussed here and is another, separate post altogether. The takeaway from that situation was that the school-issued laptops were a completely new concept to teachers, administration, parents, and even students, and that the system wasn’t perfected yet to accommodate students’ special needs.

The obvious solution to many would be to simply use one’s own computer. But here is the issue to this solution: McKinney ISD expressly prohibits students from opting out of this program. While this rule was made with good intentions, it fails in two ways:

  1. It prevents students from using their own laptop. If a student needs to accommodate their own special needs, they should be able to buy another laptop without having to forcefully rent another useless laptop they will keep in their closet the entire time. McKinney ISD already has a bring your own device (BYOD) policy, so bringing one’s own laptop shouldn’t be a big deal. BYOD has already been proven to work, and was the harbinger of the One to the World program, so there shouldn’t be any concerns with allowing BYOD exist alongside One to the World.
  2. McKinney ISD sets a precedent of choicelessness—taxpayers are now required to pay for the laptops, some of which are unused, and the school district has decided that there shall be absolutely no choice on the part of parents or students. I personally do not want to pay $50 for something if I don’t want to use it! We live in a capitalist society, why are we being forced to rent a laptop if we don’t want to use it?

Concerns with the BYOD laptops not being able to handle the district’s requirements are valid but should also be addressed in a different approach than simple concession. Most people are scared that students won’t have the ability to access the software or educational portals of the district. Since all consumer computers have web browsers, and definitely other productivity applications, this shouldn’t be a big deal. Moreover, certain access to school property (like printers) need to be opened to all computers. McKinney ISD does not get to choose what accesses what. They are not in charge here (we the people are) and it disturbs me to know that they force people to use school-issued technology to print and BYOD devices cannot connect. In addition, if software is not available for free to a student by default, McKinney ISD can set up a portal to allow students to download the software at no cost, pursuant to the existing licensing deals of McKinney ISD. If the software isn’t offered by the district and is not required to be used in class, then students will be able to purchase or download their custom software on their own machines and use them the way they see fit without the school administration forcing them through a bureaucratic process, just to simply have an application working on a computer! It distracts students from the learning process more than it does to “protect” them.

Other concerns include students flat out not using any technology, rendering the district’s transition to technology null and void. I definitely believe such an extreme should be avoided. Technology is about as important to the world as pens and pencils are to education. Education prepares students for the world. Technology is here to stay in education. But just as we are allowed to choose between mechanical pencils, yellow wooden pencils, colored pens, etc., McKinney ISD should place its trust into students into at least finding a machine that works. Just as all students must have a pencil to attend school and choose the one they like most, all students must have a computer at McKinney ISD, but it should not be limited to the school MacBooks. The school district should not be opposed to outside technology because it’s too difficult to implement; au contraire, the school district is supposed to support the needs of students, parents, teachers, etc., not what’s best for MISD. Decisions and choices need to be reintroduced to the school district, as we live in a democratic society where the government is supposed to serve us, not where we serve the government.

I thank McKinney ISD for their initial efforts of One to the World, but these outstanding issues pose a significant hurdle to the acceptance and success of this program. The end goal is to improve students’ education, which is currently not being fulfilled for everybody. This must be fixed by allowing students to opt-out of the program and use the BYOD policy of McKinney ISD, so that they may choose what works best for them.

McKinney Boyd HS Website Redesign – part 2

Website screenshot
Snapshot of the website main page as of February 10, 2016 at 11:48pm CST.

Following the developments of the previous blog post, Justin continued to work with us on finalizing his initial design in HTML. I was able to integrate the previous “JS template transclusion” idea into the website, while Justin pointed out to me that document.write(“) would suffice for multiple lines at once.

Furthermore, the old navbar has now been (unceremoniously) placed into the new website. Currently, we are stuck on moving the search bar and Quick Links to the top bar with everything else. In addition, the logo placement is a little quirky and could be fixed.

Work is now being done by the majority of the Computer Science 3 class at Boyd. Our main goals will be to create designs for the header, a uniform template for each page, and to create some of the code-needy features of our website, like a searchable teacher directory.

Our lead designer, Andrew Oakes, has proposed several new ways to design the website, all of which the dev team will take into consideration, especially concerning the header/navbar and the revamped directory.